Exceeding the speed of light may not be impossible according to claims reported by New Scientist. The debate surrounds an experiment by Günter Nimtz and Alfons Stahlhofen of the University of Koblenz, Germany, in which photons were propelled faster than the speed of light in a process known as quantum tunnelling. But does this really defy the 186,000 miles per second (300,000 kps) speed limit arising from Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity? In the weird world of quantum mechanics, where very little makes sense, it seems that it’s down to a matter of interpretation.

The popular interpretation might lead to the conclusion that the ultimate cosmic speed limit has been broken, but as explained by Alan Boyle at Cosmic Log, it’s more a question of how these laws are conceived given that the weird behavior of quantum particles tend to elicit loopholes in the Theory of Relativity. Part of this problem lies in the fact that light waves are mass less and therefore don’t fit within the parameters of the 186,000 miles per second rule.

Like many aspects of quantum mechanics it just shouldn’t happen (take for example the ability of certain sub-atomic particles to react to interference with its quantum “partner” even when they are separated by large distances) but in a world full of “known unknows”, things aren’t about to get any simpler.

Thanks.

Getting through the written examination and receving the interview call is not winning half the battle as some people are prone to think.  An interview is completely unpredictable. One can never tell what turn it will take. Preparing for an inerview has its own problem. Infact preparation may besaid to be impossible. For one thing,questions are totally unpredictable. And for another ones own reactions and behaviour are hardto guarantee beforehand.

The questions usually asked are of avery general nature related to Indian History, Current Events, personal tastes and hobbies. They can all be met satisfactory enough. But during an interview a canididate may often slip up with a hasty,unthoughtful response. A candidate must have sincerity and honesty and candidate may, absolutely mistakenly, in order to create an impression, profess attitudes and opinions not really his own.  But these can easily be perceived and even ridiculed by members of the Boardwith disastrous results.

The ignorance is not a shameful thing. Guessing at what one does not know is unperdonable. A straight-forward admission of does not harm. I myself, confessedly, had to return an apologetic “I’m afraid I don’t know,sir,”many times. Some candidates find it unnecessary to prepare for the interviewat all apart from reading daily newspapers as a matter of routine. All candidates do not feel so wellequpped and realize that need to cultivate the above qualities.

Here freinds can help immensely by examining a candidate in the manner of interview boards. This method may be considered ridiculous or useless, but it undoubtedly helps many timid or shy people to acquire at least a semblance of assurance. Thus a candidate is given the opportunity to habituate himself to being questioned closely. He becomes familiar with his shortcomings and can guard against them better.

My own interview was not of a very exciting nature. The questions were very general, relating to Gandian thought, the National movement, Religion, my favourite authors and the like. Somewhere easy, some difficult and some confusing. I had often to deny all knowledge, sometimes to beg for clarification, and admittedly I stumbled here and there. But though I could not soar with optimism, there was nothing to despair of either. The interview remain on an even keel throughout, with a few flashes of humour to lighten the atmosphere and though not lenient the board was friendly and encouraging.
All in all, it was an experience.

Thanks.

Who will be the next president in 2012 ? though there are strong predictions that Bobby Jindal aka piyush Jindal a Indian-American origin will be the next US presidential nominee and this is the hot topic on the internet on popular blogs, website and many forums….

Recently william kristol Newyork times columnist and commentator wrote in his article about Bobby Jindal as a Potential Vice-Presidential nominee for the republican party for this November presidential elections….

Piyush Jindal aka bobby jindal was born on 10th Jun 1971 in baton rouge, Lousiana to the Amar and Raj Jindal who was immigrated to US from Khanpura India in 1970 though his name is piyush jindal legally he renamed himself “bobby” influenced by the Character “Bobby Brady” watching television series at the age of four though jindal was born and raised hindu he converted to christian catholic when he was in high school and Jindal married to supriya jolly in 1996 and have three children Selia Elizabeth, shaan Robert and Slade Ryan…

Though there are many people who says that jindal would be the next person to be nominated for the next presidential elections and there are another set of people who critisizes it giving number of reasons what ever it is Jindal is considered as the rising star of the repulican party and is considered to be the dynamic and charismatic person who could lead the party in 2012 and also chariman of national republican congressional committee has invited to deliver the key note address at fundraising dinner scheduled to be held on march 24 in washington and said “Bobby is rising star and is a part of new generation of leadership in our party”…

Like obama i think bobby jindal will not be looped into religious contraversy as he converted to chrisitianity in his school days and days are not so far where we could see person from indian origin/decent as the president of united states….. guys comments are welcome!!!

Thanks..

Law, as it is,  is the command of the sovereign. Law in its legal sense, as distinguished from other uses of the term, means those principles and rules that govern and regulate social conduct and the observance of which can be enforced in courts. ”Law is that portion of the established habit and thought of mankind which has gained distinct and formal recognition in the shape of uniform rules backed by the authority and power of the Government”. Law is the rule of externalhuman action enforced by the sovereign political authority. The state makes law. Violation of state law involves a penalty which is enforced by the Government through the sovereign power of the state. Whatever is not enforceable is not law. Laws of State are applicable to all without exception in identical circumstances.

It is neither desirable nor feasible to control all kinds of activities of people through a uniform set of rules and principles. Civilised societies, therefore, provide and enforce different sets of rules and guiding principles for different kinds of social behaviour.
Therefore, there are several branches of law- Civil law, Constitutionnal law, International law, Industrial and Mercantile law.

Need for Law:

The existence of law is necessary for maintaining of peace and order in the society. In the absence of law, no person will recognise the rights of others. Life cannot be lived peace-fully and business cannot be carried out smoothly without law to regulate the conduct of people and to protect their property and also of the most ruthless, in the absence of law. Take the example of game. A game cannot be played satisfactorily without rules to govern the players.

As a human being, every person comes into contact with others in different capacities; for instances, with sellers as a buyer, with companies as a shareholder, with traders as a purchaser of things, with insurers as assured, with government as a taxpayer, citizen or employee etc. In all such dealings, a person is expected to observe certain sets of rules which govern each other. It follows that some knowledge of law is necessary for every person. As a matter of fact, an individual is confronted, almost daily, with situations that demand certain knowledge of law, in the absence of which he may suffer on account of legal actions against him. The term ‘Law’ denotes rules and principles either enforced by an authority or self-imposed by the members of a society to control and regulate people’s behaviour with a view to securing justice, peaceful life and social security.

Thanks.

Law, as it is,  is the command of the sovereign. Law in its legal sense, as distinguished from other uses of the term, means those principles and rules that govern and regulate social conduct and the observance of which can be enforced in courts. “Law is that portion of the established habit and thought of mankind which has gained distinct and formal recognition in the shape of uniform rules backed by the authority and power of the Government”. Law is the rule of externalhuman action enforced by the sovereign political authority. The state makes law. Violation of state law involves a penalty which is enforced by the Government through the sovereign power of the state. Whatever is not enforceable is not law. Laws of State are applicable to all without exception in identical circumstances.

It is neither desirable nor feasible to control all kinds of activities of people through a uniform set of rules and principles. Civilised societies, therefore, provide and enforce different sets of rules and guiding principles for different kinds of social behaviour.
Therefore, there are several branches of law- Civil law, Constitutionnal law, International law, Industrial and Mercantile law.

Need for Law:

The existence of law is necessary for maintaining of peace and order in the society. In the absence of law, no person will recognise the rights of others. Life cannot be lived peace-fully and business cannot be carried out smoothly without law to regulate the conduct of people and to protect their property and also of the most ruthless, in the absence of law. Take the example of game. A game cannot be played satisfactorily without rules to govern the players.

As a human being, every person comes into contact with others in different capacities; for instances, with sellers as a buyer, with companies as a shareholder, with traders as a purchaser of things, with insurers as assured, with government as a taxpayer, citizen or employee etc.

In all such dealings, a person is expected to observe certain sets of rules which govern each other. It follows that some knowledge of law is necessary for every person. As a matter of fact, an individual is confronted, almost daily, with situations that demand certain knowledge of law, in the absence of which he may suffer on account of legal actions against him. The term ‘Law’ denotes rules and principles either enforced by an authority or self-imposed by the members of a society to control and regulate people’s behaviour with a view to securing justice, peaceful life and social security.

Thanks.

Law, as it is,  is the command of the sovereign. Law in its legal sense, as distinguished from other uses of the term, means those principles and rules that govern and regulate social conduct and the observance of which can be enforced in courts. “Law is that portion of the established habit and thought of mankind which has gained distinct and formal recognition in the shape of uniform rules backed by the authority and power of the Government”. Law is the rule of externalhuman action enforced by the sovereign political authority.
The state makes law. Violation of state law involves a penalty which is enforced by the Government through the sovereign power of the state. Whatever is not enforceable is not law. Laws of State are applicable to all without exception in identical circumstances.

It is neither desirable nor feasible to control all kinds of activities of people through a uniform set of rules and principles. Civilised societies, therefore, provide and enforce different sets of rules and guiding principles for different kinds of social behaviour.
Therefore, there are several branches of law- Civil law, Constitutionnal law, International law, Industrial and Mercantile law.

Need for Law:

The existence of law is necessary for maintaining of peace and order in the society. In the absence of law, no person will recognise the rights of others. Life cannot be lived peace-fully and business cannot be carried out smoothly without law to regulate the conduct of people and to protect their property and also of the most ruthless, in the absence of law. Take the example of game. A game cannot be played satisfactorily without rules to govern the players.

As a human being, every person comes into contact with others in different capacities; for instances, with sellers as a buyer, with companies as a shareholder, with traders as a purchaser of things, with insurers as assured, with government as a taxpayer, citizen or employee etc. In all such dealings, a person is expected to observe certain sets of rules which govern each other. It follows that some knowledge of law is necessary for every person. As a matter of fact, an individual is confronted, almost daily, with situations that demand certain knowledge of law, in the absence of which he may suffer on account of legal actions against him. The term ‘Law’ denotes rules and principles either enforced by an authority or self-imposed by the members of a society to control and regulate people’s behaviour with a view to securing justice, peaceful life and social security.

Thanks.